- The parochial interests of the warfare communities are the primary drivers and major organizing theme of officer management, slighting higher level needs that have their foundation in the Navy mission.
- The Navy doesn't own its own people. The warfare communities do and control them absolutely.
- The primary rationale behind officer assignments—the sacred Triad of Detailing—contains a gigantic flaw.
- The mechanics of assignment transactions are poorly managed.
- Tour lengths are much too short for good efficiency.
- Up-or-out officer management is horribly wasteful.
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Three Great Apes
The three major warfare communities lord over the Navy like great apes, demanding loyalty and hoarding power. Only by overhauling the personnel system can we reduce their power and get everyone back in service of the Navy itself.
These warrior apes have admirable strengths: expertise in their craft, professionalism in their role, and huge devotion to their kind. But they also do the Navy harm: their internal interests overwhelm the Navy's broader interests, their single-mindedness impedes the Navy's larger mission, and their internal focus breeds loyalty that causes a profound under-imagination of the Navy's potential future.
Our officer personnel system is failing the Navy mission in many ways:
Let's tackle these personnel problems by starting with a single, unarguable premise: the officers of the Navy exist to serve the Navy. Not themselves. Not their particular kind of warrior ape. The Navy.