Character and standards of personal conduct remain of highest importance, as has always been true of military leaders. The effective naval officer of the present and future, like his brother of the past, must regard his commission as a career, not a mere job. He dedicates himself to the high ideals of military leadership. Some who receive commissions, all being human, will prove unequal to these standards (e.g. the 22 COs fired in 2011). There have been a few unfortunate events of recent years, well known to most people, which have weakened the standing of the Armed Forces in the eyes of many people. To whatever extent this feeling persists, to that degree the security of the nation has been compromised. People will not entrust willingly their sons or husbands to military leadership, even in time of emergency or war, unless they have abundant faith in the character as well as the professional competence of the great mass of military leaders. The presence of a few names of national prominence will not alone suffice. Ensigns and lieutenants are important, as captains and admirals are important. The standing of the whole is essential. Enlisted men will not willingly and effectively train or fight if they have doubts where there should be confidence.
From: The Naval Officer's Manual
2 comments:
Vice Admiral Branch
the system does not allow us to wick down. we get nothing but the bitter word.
a full year of investihating but nought to tell you. So long admiral.
With Branch they pissed it all away. He got a year of investigation when other Commanding Officers are relieved instantaneously at the mere hint or breath of a misdemeanor.
I wouldn't join this navy and I won't encourage my daughter or nephews too either.
Post a Comment