In a recent discussion with a cyber 'expert', she said she has grown increasingly FATIGUED with the language being used in cybersphere. She said we should stop using these words in conjunction with cyber - either as prefix of suffix.
- attack
- warrior
Musings, leadership tidbits and quotes posted by a retired Navy Captain (really just a high performing 2nd Class Petty Officer) who hung up his uniform a bit too early. He still wears his Navy service on his sleeve. He needs to get over that. "ADVANCE WARNING - NO ORIGINAL THOUGHT!" A "self-appointed" lead EVANGELIST for the "cryptologic community". Keeping CRYPTOLOGY alive-one day and Sailor at a time. 2015 is 80th Anniversary of the Naval Security Group.
1 comment:
No. Absolutely not.
Warfare is the application of violence from a legitimate party (i.e. a government organization). NSA would like you to believe that cyber is all about intel prep of the environment, and in that case they couldn't be more wrong.
How is it not violence if you can:
- Turn off someone's pacemaker (http://www.computerworld.com/article/2981527/cybercrime-hacking/researchers-hack-a-pacemaker-kill-a-man-nequin.html)
- Attack a water supply and potentially poison people (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/03/24/water_utility_hacked/)
- Break an electrical grid (http://money.cnn.com/2016/01/18/technology/ukraine-hack-russia/)
I see it no different from other forms of warfare. The effects are the same.
Post a Comment