Friday, January 31, 2014

Some readers have suggested that I have a bias toward NIOC Yokosuka

They are 100% correct.

And, so I say:

Congratulations to CTT1(IDW/SW) Shayne Franklin for his selection as 1 of 5 Finalists for the Fleet Cyber Command (FCC)/Navy Cyber Force (NCF) Shore Sailor of the Year.
 
Congratulations to CTMC(IDW/SS) Adam Birkholz, the NIOC Yokosuka 2014 nominee for the NCVA Award for Cryptologic Support Excellence (ACSE).

Congratulations to CTRC(IDW/NAC/PJ) Alexander Ollison, the NIOC Yokosuka 2014 nominee for the On-the-Roof Gang (OTRG) Award.
 
Best of luck Shipmates.  You are already winners and carry forward the legacy of the fine NSGD Yokosuka and NSGA Yokosuka Sailors who served there before you.
 

Thursday, January 30, 2014

I guess it is official now

CDR Mike Rogers turns over command of NSGA Winter Harbor to CDR E.F. Williamson
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
No. NR-058-14
January 30, 2014



DOD Announces Nomination of Cyber Command Commander/ NSA Director

Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced today Navy Vice Adm. Michael S. Rogers as President Obama's nominee to become commander of U.S. Cyber Command. In addition, the Secretary announced that he has designated Vice Adm. Rogers to serve as director of the National Security Agency, and chief of the Central Security Service.
Vice Adm. Rogers currently serves as the U.S. Fleet Cyber Command commander. If confirmed by the U.S. Senate, he will replace Gen. Keith Alexander, who has served as the NSA director since 2005, and the Cyber Command commander since 2010.

Additionally, the department is announcing that Richard Ledgett has been selected to serve as the NSA deputy director.  In his new role as the senior civilian at NSA, Ledgett acts at the agency's chief operating officer. He replaces J. Chris Inglis, who retired from the position in January.

How is your Mess doing? MCPON Guidance for CPO365

MCPON's Guidance is HERE.

A Final Note

I expect every Chief Petty Officer to read this guidance in its entirety, and for all CPO Messes to discuss it as groups. While the guidance is not all-inclusive, it does provide a proven foundation for effectively developing a new generation of CPOs. Solid leadership, sound judgment, common sense and situational awareness need to prevail in all situations not expressly covered in this document.

I expect you and every member of your Mess to exercise the leadership and professionalism that we are entrusted with each and every day; hence CPO 365. We each know the difference between right and wrong and will be held accountable. I have the utmost confidence in our ability as a Mess to continue to build upon the legacy of success forged by all that have worn anchors.

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

A recent conversation - "Director of Sailor Success"?


I had a nice conversation with one of our Navy Information Operations Command's officers recently. He said that his Skipper had begun calling him his "Director of Sailor Success".  At first I thought perhaps they were reading too many business books or those Harvard Business Review book summaries.  After hearing him out, it made more sense.

He explained...Along with their Command Master Chief, he was responsible for all training at the command.  Together, they co-chaired the Planning Board For Training (PB4T).  They set up the long range command schedule for a two year period year and reviewed it (along with the short range schedule) on a monthly basis.  Their philosophy - "great plan, great training; good plan, good training; no plan, no training".  They spent their time planning for and executing programs focused on Sailor success.

He continued..."At this command, we value training and that value is recognized.  We keep it realistic and practical - no wasting our Sailors' time.  Our training programs are monitored and evaluated.  We are fortunate to have some real Master Training Specialists right out of the Center for Information Dominance (CID) Corry Station who have turned our training program upside down.  Our Sailors thirst for knowledge.  Believe it our not, some of our training sessions are "Standing Room Only."  Everyone in the command participates in training and development - Seaman to CO - no exceptions.  Our professional development programs are second to none!  Our Sailors take this stuff seriously.  Our Sailors qualify on time and they promote better than the average of the other NIOCs - at every paygrade.  And it's especially nice to have a Chiefs Mess that is really the driving force behind the professional development of our Sailors.  It's one of the keys to our success.  We train for it."

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Admiral James R. Stavridis - would have been a Naval aviator, except for that one bad experience in his youth


Admiral James Stavridis' speech at the Surface Navy Association (SNA) from 16 January is HERE.

Briefly, he said, we should:
  • Listen more
  • Build intellectual capital
  • Learn languages
  • Use social networks
  • Use every available technology to our advantage
In the past, we focused on building walls.  Today, we need to focus on building bridges to create collaboration.

LCS will work.  We've had early problems with every ship type.  Sailors overcome.

We need to think more about cyber.  "Vice Admiral Rogers, this is for you.  I was more worried about cyber than any other aspect in my last job."

No one should doubt the ability of the U.S. Navy or the surface warfare community "to conduct prompt and sustained combat operations at sea.  It is who we are and what we do."

Monday, January 27, 2014

A Great Read - Robert Gates’s book, Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War


Guest Post by LCDR Christopher Nelson, USN

Wow, just...wow.  I recently finished Robert Gates’s book, Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War -- it’s a great book. I had, like many of you, read some excerpts in the Wall Street Journal, the review in the New York Times, and heard the hoopla prior to it hitting the shelves.  Some of the early reviews managed to pull the same quotes from the book, giving us the impression -- wrongly as it turns out -- that the former Secretary of Defense was slinging mud all over the place.  Not so.  Not even close.  Well, instead of writing a review of the book, I want to highlight a few things in the book that are unfortunately missing from other reviews.  And that is 1) his management style, and 2) some tid-bits that deserve some reflection and thought for anyone wearing a uniform in today’s military.  I hope these scraps are enough to persuade you to pick up a copy and add it to your personal library.  Here we go:

“Symbolic gestures have substantive and real benefits.”  Secretary Gates made an effort early in his tenure to meet senior military commanders -- Combatant Commanders, the Joint Chiefs -- on their turf (e.g., COCOM HQs, “The Tank”) rather than summoning the Commanders to the Pentagon.  He noticed that [his] “approach in dealing with the military leadership had a far more positive impact than [he] had expected.” 

On PowerPoint. “...it was the bane of my existence in Pentagon meetings; it was as no one could talk without them.”

Write the note.  Following Admiral “Fox” Fallon’s Esquire interview, and the subsequent fallout, he sent Secretary Gates a “very gracious, handwritten letter of apology...”

Go into a meeting with a strategy and a desired outcome.  “A meeting in the Situation Room was never just another gathering...outcomes were important, and I always had a strategy going in.”

On Influences.  “Political scientists, historians, and reporters are often completely unaware of events or experiences unseen by the public eye that influence important decisions...an HBO movie, Taking Chance...had an important impact” [on his decision to publicly honor fallen service men/women arriving at Dover, AFB].  (Me: If you haven’t seen Taking Chance, you need to find a copy and watch it.)

Not all leadership is equal...and just because you are the “next in line” doesn’t mean you are the best qualified for the job. “...[T]he qualities important for military leadership and success in war are not the same as those required in peacetime.  In war, boldness, adaptability, creativity, sometimes ignoring the rules, risk taking, and ruthlessness are essential for success.  These are not characteristics that will get you very far in peacetime...too many officers were assigned to command positions because the stateside personnel system identified them as “next in line” rather than because they were selected as best qualified for the combat mission.”

Know your expertise; Know your lane.  “For some reason, more and more senior officers seem compelled to seek a high public profile and to speak out, often on politically sensitive issues or even on matters beyond their responsibility (not to mention expertise).”

And I could go on.  There is a lot to absorb in 594 pages.  Even from the few quotes I included above there is plenty to chew on.  It is one of the most honest and candid political memoirs that I’ve read.  Yes, to some the word “honest” is an oxymoron when coupled with the words “political memoir.”  I get it.  But my guidepost when reading this type of work has always been this:  is the writer able to criticize and analyze themselves?  And can they highlight mistakes they made?  Do they discuss how they would have done it differently if given the chance?  If they can do these things, then in my opinion, I would consider it an excellent candidate for an “honest and candid political memoir.” I believe Secretary Gates has done all these things, and done them well.  But hey, go pick up a copy for yourself and make your own decision.

LCDR Christopher Nelson, USN, is an intelligence officer currently attending US Naval War College and the Maritime Advanced Warfighting School in Newport, RI.  The views above are his and his alone, and do not reflect those of the United States Navy or the Department of Defense.

Sunday, January 26, 2014

This great news from the Washington Post

Obama signs off on nomination of Vice Admiral Michael S. Rogers, Commander Fleet Cyber Command/TENTH Fleet as NSA Director

President Obama has signed off on the nomination of Vice Admiral Michael S. Rogers to lead the embattled National Security Agency and the Pentagon’s cyberwarfare organization, according to sources familiar with the decision.

In an unusual move, Obama himself interviewed Rogers last week, in a reflection of the job’s high profile at a time when the NSA has drawn fire for the scope of its surveillance practices.
Vice Admiral Michael S. Rogers would succeed General Keith Alexander, who is retiring this year.
White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden declined to comment, but people familiar with the matter said an announcement is expected soon.




Criticism

“ To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing. ”
- Aristotle

Saturday, January 25, 2014

Legacy


-->This involves the lasting impact you have on the people in your command. In this respect, your legacy “can be seen in the thoughts and actions of the people who have worked with or for you long after your tour has ended.
We define this type of legacy as “the sum total of the difference you make in people’s lives, directly and indirectly, formally and informally.”  In other words, when you turn over command to your relief, what attitudes or ways of thinking have you instilled into the command that will continue after you are gone? 

The fact that your command earned an “outstanding” on an inspection is not a legacy; a legacy is the commitment to excellence and attention to detail you developed in the command. It's the pride of ownership you have instilled in your Sailors and the skills they take with them to improve things at their next command.  

Friday, January 24, 2014

What they really mean...

1. A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES ARE BEING TRIED—
We are still clueless.
2. EXTENSIVE REPORT IS BEING PREPARED ON A FRESH APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM—
We just hired three kids fresh out of college.
3. CLOSE PROJECT COORDINATION—
We know who to blame.
4. MAJOR TECHNOLOGICAL BREAKTHROUGH—
It works only so so, but looks very hi-tech.
5. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION IS DELIVERED ASSURED—
We are so far behind schedule the customer is happy just to get it delivered.
6. PRELIMINARY OPERATIONAL TESTS WERE INCONCLUSIVE—
The darn thing blew up when we threw the switch.
7. TEST RESULTS WERE EXTREMELY GRATIFYING—
We are so surprised that the stupid thing works.
8. THE ENTIRE CONCEPT WILL HAVE TO BE ABANDONED—
The only person who understood the thing quit.
9. IT IS IN THE PROCESS—
It is so wrapped up in red tape that the situation is about hopeless.
10. WE WILL LOOK INTO IT—
Forget it! We have enough problems for now.
11. PLEASE NOTE AND INITIAL—
Let's spread the responsibility for the mistake.
12. GIVE US THE BENEFIT OF YOUR THINKING—
We'll listen to what you have to say as long as it doesn't interfere with what we've already done.
13. GIVE US YOUR INTERPRETATION—
I can't wait to hear this nonsense!
14. SEE ME OR LET'S DISCUSS—
Come into my office, I'm lonely.
15. ALL NEW—
Parts not interchangeable with the previous design.
16. RUGGED—
Too darn heavy to lift!
17. LIGHTWEIGHT—
Lighter than RUGGED.
18. YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT—
One finally worked.
19. ENERGY SAVING—
Achieved when the power switch is off.
20. LOW MAINTENANCE—
Impossible to fix if broken.

From the U.S. government's plain writing website.

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Command in the spotlight - Navy Information Operations Command Colorado

"Work Hard, Play Hard, Do What's Right"
MISSION
Motivate, train and qualify Sailors to accomplish the operational objectives of the Navy, Aerospace Data Facility Colorado and NSA/CSS Colorado. We provide Sailors robust opportunities to develop, improve and excel to meet the dynamic challenges of our future. We also provide first-rate administrative and security services to Company A, CSG TRANSCOM, CSG STRATCOM, and NIOCR Colorado.

VISION
Operational excellence, effective training and Command programs that provide a content rich environment for Sailors of NIOC Colorado.

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Some thoughts

  • Always bring something to the table that will make you more welcome.
  • Critics are good. They are the ones who show they care about what you are doing. Their criticism is affirmation that you are doing SOMETHING.
  • Make sure the artifacts of your life show purpose and meaning.
  • Benjamin Zander's rule #6 - "Don't take yourself so damn seriously".
  • Command is the zenith of military achievement.
  • Be worthy to lead. Then, lead a life of consequence.
  • Think as a man of action; act as a man of thought.
  • Honor never grows old.
  • The truth provides a fixed point of reference.  Where ever you go, you will always find your way back to the truth.  It is a steady marker.
  • Audacity matters. Be audacious !
  • Be extraordinary for your Sailors.

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

VADM Ken Malley Rule # 6

Before you utter that next complaint about your Skipper, DH, DIV OFF, DIV CHIEF or LPO, consider:

6. No matter what you think of your boss, if he or she does not end up being a hero, neither do you.

Taking a page from one of Captain Andy Stewart's leadership interests - Patrick Lencione

In the interest of remaining 100% honest and true to the original precepts of this blog ("ADVANCE WARNING - NO ORIGINAL THOUGHT!"), the idea of NAKED LEADERSHIP is "stolen" lock, stock and barrel from a genuine thought leader in the field of organizational leadership - Patrick Lencione, founder of the table group - a patrick lencione company.  

This is a model well worth exploring further, which I intend to do  The idea comes from Patrick Lencione's exceptional book - Getting NAKED - which I highly recommend.

Monday, January 20, 2014

I really like this post from LT Ryan Haag about taking time to read

The BOLD in this post is my own highlighting of Ryan's points.

Seth Godin nails it about taking time to actually read:  His post is HERE.

It is AMAZING to me the number of people that don't read email.  The conversation I get normally goes like this:

"Hey, did you read my email? I need an answer about X."

"No man, I didn't have time. It was too long."

Even more amazing is the number of people that don't read papers that are routed to them.

It would seem everyone is in such a hurry because of all the work that needs to be done that there simply isn't enough time to read.  Except that when I walk around, I see people updating Facebook, chatting about sports or their latest shopping trip, or in general not working balls to the wall.

I refuse to believe that you don't have time to read email, or papers, or whatever comes across your desk.  While I do believe that if you send your boss a long email you should put a Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF) line at the top so that he or she can get the gist, most of my emails are one paragraph.  Telling me you can't read it because you are so busy really tells me you don't care, that my issue is less important than you updating your Facebook status.

I read every piece of paper that comes across my desk.  The great thing about this is that over time I get better and better at reviewing.  I'm able to work through a stack of routine papers in only fifteen minutes because I have learned what good and bad paperwork looks like.  Besides, if I'm going to sign my name on it, I should at least go through it to make sure it doesn't come back to bite me.

By no means am I perfect, but the only way to get better at reviewing paperwork and working through email taskers is to actually read them.  If you're one of those folks that says you're too busy, stop lying to the rest of us and simply admit you are lazy and not prioritizing those that took the time to do the research and send you a well written email.

Read all of Ryan's stuff.  I have not been disappointed once.  You can click on his blog at the top of my WORTH YOUR TIME, ALWAYS widget on the top left side of my Blog or go HERE.